Oh, and you might want to fix your toolinfo.json files, they have comments. Unfortunately JSON doesn't allow that.
-- Hay On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Hay (Husky) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Hedonil, > thanks for the suggestion for a 'repository' property, i've added > that. Adding it now adds a 'source available' link in the tool card, > and also groups them in a special category. > > -- Hay > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Hedonil <[email protected]> wrote: >> Awesomeness has been found! >> This thing was long overdue and finally you came up with an easy >> solution. Thx. >> >> Many approaches have been started in the past to solve this issue (lokal >> wikis, meta, some fields iin wikitech...). >> Maybe merge this info with some ldap fields and make it accessible it >> via OAuth, too. >> We should definitely start a discussion to gain more ideas about a >> unified, comprehensive Tools(Labs)-directory - this json-thing is the >> right starting point. >> >> If Coren & Andrew could start and coordinate such a small but >> nonetheless important project (~4 weeks), that would be great. >> >> As a first suggestion to the current json: >> - Could you add a field "repo" to tell "OpenSource" from >> "Not-So-OpenSource" and to have all relevant info's at a glance ? >> >> ...and a minor thing: >> Pls. add >> >> mimetype.assign += ( >> ".log" => "text/plain", >> ) >> >> to your .lighttpd.conf (create if not exist). That'll make the logs >> readable in the browser. >> >> Good job. Cheers >> -Hedonil >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Labs-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
