Hey Yuvi, i agree that having comments in JSON would be wonderful, but for now i think it's better to stick to a well-known standard instead of either using non-standardized JSON or a format that less people are familiair with.
And obviously, it would be awesome if the list would be so good that we could replace tools.wmflabs.org. -- Hay On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Yuvi Panda <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Hay (Husky) <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, and you might want to fix your toolinfo.json files, they have >> comments. Unfortunately JSON doesn't allow that. > > If you're using python, you can use > http://commentjson.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ and that'll allow > comments :) You can also switch to a YAML parser instead - those allow > comments, and all valid JSON is also valid YAML (And I think YAML is > more human writeable) > > Awesome work, btw! I think once this reaches some sort of 'niceness' > we should make it the default list from tools.wmflabs.org (after some > hardening work) > -- > Yuvi Panda T > http://yuvi.in/blog > > _______________________________________________ > Labs-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
