I concur that using WMF resources to enable circumvention of speedy deletion processes shows no faith in our editors for nominating and administrators in determining if the SD rationale is correct. Second, since this is some sort of bot process, has it ever passed through BRFA as it appears to be using a non trivial amount of resources.
Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 3, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Pietro De Nicolao <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Il giorno 03/nov/2014, alle ore 06:48, Rschen7754 Wikipedia >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> >> I’m a bit concerned about this, as it is essentially leaking deleted content >> on en.wikipedia and putting it elsewhere on the Internet where it is >> publicly accessible. While of course we can’t stop people from doing it on >> outside systems, I don’t really think Wikimedia Labs should be doing >> something like this. >> >> Rschen7754 > > He's not "leaking deleted content" (he has no means to do so unless he's a > en.wiki admin), its tool is automatically duplicating content that (by the > judgement of the author) is at risk of being deleted. > This is fully compatible with Wikipedia license. One could argue that this > service doesn't bring benefits to Wikipedia, though. > > Pietro De Nicolao > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Labs-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
