On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Maximilian Doerr <[email protected]> wrote: > Which tools are the offending tools?
I'm not sure I would classify any of the tools with lots of parallel jobs running as "offending". That word has some aggressive connotations at least in English. I'm also not sure that naming and shaming anyone is useful. If you really want to know where I've been intervening, you can grep for !log messages by me in the #wikimedia-cloud freenode IRC channel logs for the last 24 hours or so. We do have a tool at http://tools.wmflabs.org/grid-jobs/ that shows data updated once an hour that allows sorting and drilling down into per-tool information. This tool and a graphite view of running jobs over time (<https://graphite-labs.wikimedia.org/render?title=Tools&yMin=0&width=800&height=400&target=cactiStyle(alias(sumSeries(tools.tools-services-01.sge.hosts.tools-*-12*.job_count),%27precise%27))&target=cactiStyle(alias(sumSeries(tools.tools-services-01.sge.hosts.tools-*-14*.job_count),%27trusty%27))&target=cactiStyle(alias(tools.tools-k8s-master-01.KubernetesCollector.namespaces.active,%27k8s%27))&from=-90days>) are what led to deeper investigation. Bryan -- Bryan Davis Wikimedia Foundation <[email protected]> [[m:User:BDavis_(WMF)]] Manager, Cloud Services Boise, ID USA irc: bd808 v:415.839.6885 x6855 _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
