Matthieu Riou wrote:
I don't think an incubator podling could be created for a project
started by only 2 guys developing with passion (meaning evenings and
week-ends).
Why not? They day the incubator has a rule like that, I'm outa here.
And if they start in the lab, what is their chance to
attract more users if they can't release? In my experience, at least 90%
of new committers started as users so no user often means no additional
committer. Don't you think?
No. I think of labs as a place for existing committers, to experiment,
to learn. If I want users (aka "build a community") I'll go to incubator.
I'm fairly conservative here. This isn't the incubator.
I think of it as an academic lab, and the mail list as a continuous
weekly colloquium or department tea, being able to talk with peers. If
I want to go public, there are other, known ways to do that (incubator).
geir
On 11/26/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> I continue to think that if you feel the need to be able to do
software
> releases, what you need is an incubator podling, not a lab.
+1
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
