Actually, I was able to decipher the first version too, by ignoring the "funny worms" and going by context. I get weird text all the time - from Poland - whenever someone forgets to misuse their keyboard (ie strip all the letters of their accents, hooks, and other embelishments)

On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Devon) wrote:

Helene from Melbourne stated on Dec. 16th that "Rich People and
"cultivated" people need to be educated about modern lace", and I have answered the call.

And I thoroughly enjoyed your report, as usual; people who have both the sense of humour and the ease of using the language are almost as much joy to me as lacemaking itself :)


A few things have occured to me, while reading the report of your efforts to make lace visible:

1) both pieces you "advertised" were made in wire... The lace (I, also, try to wear it, when I leave the house, though my millieu is more likely to be WallMart and the public library than the high-fallutin' venues *you* visit <g>) that seemed to catch the eye here (seldom, and the eye was of people who have neither the time to make it nor the money to buy it) was *also* wire jewelry (mostly made from Lenka's kits). Does that mean that all of us ought to swith to wire, in order to capture the public's attention?

2) As an erst-while linguist, I was amused to see that the two pieces were mirror-imgaged, in a way: one was made by LS (Lenka Suchanek) and one by SL (Susan Lambiris) <g>

3) 'tis a pity *you* aren't "rich and famous" yourself; I bet Julia Robert's chest-display gets a lot of attention... :)

--
Tamara P Duvall                            http://t-n-lace.net/
Lexington, Virginia, USA     (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to