On Feb 7, 2006, at 14:45, bevw wrote:
... to wear to the banquet at the next lace event?!
On the cover of the February 'Marie Claire' - a beautiful young woman
wears a lace-backed dress (note, some interpretation on the term
'back').
No bra and no underpants? No way! <g> The lady is pretty and the lace
may be so (hard to see detail on my screen) but have my butt barely
veiled, in public? Not even when I was 18-20 and wild (like Clay, I too
was a "child of the 60ties") would I have been comfortable in that
conoction.
OTOH, in today's NYTimes, there was a shirt which I would actually be
willing to buy (if the price were reasonable, which isn't likely).
Didn't have any lace, but begged for it -- a pendant, a choker or a
collar would look spectacular with it. I wouldn't pair it with those
black trousers myself (a long skirt, tight in the hips and flaring out
at the bottom would go better with the richness of the shirt, IMO), but
the shirt itself is yummy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/fashion/shows/07FASHION.html?
_r=1&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
or:
http://tinyurl.com/bbjo6
Under the photo of the silver brocade suit of De La Renta, click for
"more photos" and I think it's th 4th or 5th...
--
Tamara P Duvall http://t-n-lace.net/
Lexington, Virginia, USA (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
