Hello Spiders
It is a self fulfilling prophecy. If most of the lace comunity insists on
despising it, it will never become any good. Anyone can enter: indeed,
anyone can correct rubbish too. If enough people cooperate it works like a
charm and the truth and valuable information will sooner or later emerse. If
you want to know the weight of a cow without using scales, let a huge crowd
guess and get fairly close with the average.
If all would turn their cirtical energy in positive feeds for Wikipadia it
might have a chance.
The wikipedia was a valuable math-source for me, helping to set the cross
marks for twists in the BobbinWork Viewer.
Jo Falkink
near Gouda, Netherlands
http://www.xs4all.nl/~falkink/lace/eval-EN.html
On Jun 20, 2006, at 18:20, Annette Meldrum wrote:
As a librarian, I do not think Wikipedia is worth the trouble to add
entries. As it is not authoritative and anyone can enter without any
qualification or necessary level of knowledge, you cannot trust what you
read there so I would rather consult a more legitimate source?
That has always been the reason I resisted consulting Wikipedia also. But,
...
Tamara P Duvall
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
