There have been large and long debates on knitting and lace knitting lists 
about this kind of thing, and I have two friends who are patent/copyright 
attorneys who have advised me, and one did get into a discussion on a list.  
Some of the challenge on one of them was the owners of the list published 
patterns, and so wanted to overstate copyright to put fear into people, which 
perpetuated misinformation (such as you can't even make a working copy or 
photocopy something out of the library, even if out-of-print).

To simplify, copyrights are to protect the designer from someone else taking 
their profit.  That would be either to take a pattern, change authorship and 
get credit/profit from it, or take the pattern and use it to commercially 
produce goods, such as a manufacturer, or cottage business where someone would 
make dozens or thousands of goods from someone else's patterns.  Of course the 
latter doesn't typically apply to bobbin lace.

There are some inferences about a percentage of change to a pattern and then it 
becomes yours, and though that 10% rule is often stated, is not clear.  There 
was one lace knit designer who was taking popular patterns, changing one stitch 
and sometimes the shape, like a triangle to a rectangle and putting her name on 
it.  I call that a "Cut and Paste" designer and it doesn't feel morally right 
to me to ride on other's tails, but I digress.  Sometimes old knitting patterns 
written out and then changed to charted are consider as getting/changing 
ownership.  There are people doing that with Niebling patterns and many who 
won't buy them as they consider that infringement.

I spoke to the author of a famous out-of-print book, and she stated that a 
working copy is legal, as have the attorneys I have spoken to.  The attys also 
stated that there is also misunderstanding about copyright (and registered), as 
just putting the stamp on it, or even registering it has people assume that it 
in fact is protected, when legally the item may not be copyrightable, falling 
within copyright guidelines, and one example of this reminds me of a situation 
where I tried to patent a very cool system I had for diagnosis, but included 
soft goods and so it didn't qualify.  Copyright of a pattern or artistic piece 
with words, and not pictures or an end-product/sample becomes another huge 
point.  So many things to cover, but sometimes it boils down to the person or 
company that has money can bully the one that doesn't into complying, when the  
"little guy" is appropriate, and the power source is not, etc.   

So in short they stated that to make a "working copy" to save your original, 
and to make an item and sell it, would not generally be considered illegal.  I 
know myself with my lace knitting patterns (I only have one now as a pdf 
download), that if someone knit that pattern for a wedding and charged for it, 
at this point in time I wouldn't have a problem with it, but if someone took 
that pattern (which took about 1800 hours with test knitting 6-7 times, and 
some sections up to two dozen times) I would not be happy and pursue.

Essentially to me it is a moral issue, and the Golden Rule applies, or "Do unto 
others as you would have others do unto you."  That is the simplest way to 
state it, and if that was how life was lived, much of this wouldn't be an issue.

I don't think most people would have a problem with someone selling one item 
they made from a pattern they created, and with the way needlework is valued 
overall, if they could get a good price, then kudos to them!

Best,
Susan Reishus
www.SusanReishusDesigns.com
who agrees with Brenda's statement:
"However, if you buy just a pattern sheet the most it's likely to have 
printed on it is the Copyright symbol (c) and the designer's name.  
That means you can't copy the pattern (other than for fair usage which 
does mean a copy to prick through and write notes on without damaging 
your 'original'), but it doesn't specifically exclude you from selling 
a derivative work.  (In UK) even without the (c) on it an artistic 
work, which a BL pattern is, is automatically copyrighted at its 
creation, but not necessarily any derivative work."




      

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]

Reply via email to