Stevie
Your question requires a long answer.  Partly there is a problem of what the
terms mean  When modern lacemakers think of "Flanders" lace they usually think
of the lace Ilske described in her email:  a straight lace with 5 hole ground,
gimp surrounds the cloth stitch motifs, 2 pairs enter the clothwork at each
pin.  And that does describe revival era Flanders lace (c. 1890-1920).

However, if we go back to the 18th century it gets complicated.  As I
understand Santina Levey, she says that the 18th century laces called
"Mechlin" have that name because that is the major city.  But laces were made
in all the villages around and in Flanders.  So, for 18th century laces
Flanders and Mechlin are 2 words for the same laces.  These had gimp.  But the
ground used changed over time.  In the early 1700s the laces could have had
any of these grounds: 5 hole, Valenciennes, Paris, Mechlin, snowflakes, half
stitch snowflakes (It is called 12 thread armure in older books.)  As time
went on most of the grounds ceased to be used, and 5 hole became more common.
http://lynxlace.com/bobbinlace18th.html

But then during the period 1790-1820 the laces changed in style considerably,
and had short repeats near the edge, with substantial clear net between the
motifs at the headside and the footside.  The ground was often decorated with
square tallies or small gimp motifs.  The grounds used were either Mechlin
ground or point ground.  During the 19th century all those other complex
grounds disappeared until the revival era, when new designs for the old style
were created.
http://lynxlace.com/bobbinlacenapoleonic.html

Gimp seems to have been used at least from the 18th century.  Some Pottenkant
laces (mostly Antwerp 1600s) have gimp, some don't.

Parallel with this were the straight laces without gimp.  She says
Valenciennes and Binche were 2 towns very close together, and she doubts that
the laces made in those towns or near them differed in any significant way.
So one could call them Val/Binche.  The grounds used during the 1700s followed
the same sequence as Mechlin/Flanders:  early on 5 hole, Paris, Val,
snowflakes, half stitch snowflakes were all used.  But in this case Val ground
is the one that persisted into the 19th century.

As to why Brussels didn't use five hole ground, I could only offer a guess.
In any part lace the focus is on the motifs, and you want the background to
virtually disappear.  Five hole ground is visually striking and would detract
from the visual impact of the motifs.  In the early 1700s the motifs were
quite large, with very small gaps between them.  The gaps were bridged by
zigzag braids.  Brussels laces from the 1700s, with grounds instead of braids,
that I have seen, had either Mechlin/Brussels ground (similar except for the
number of half stitches in the stack) or Val ground.
Lorelei

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to