It could be symbolic of water fowl, rather than a specific bird? There isn't a lot of space in the ground area. The beak being long might have been pleasing in shape to the pattern designer vs. the space occupied by the other floral-type object (water lily? something else entirely?).
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > ---- Ilske Thomsen <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree the last one hasn't the beak of a swan. ..... > > Pelican was my second guess, too. .... > -- Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada - To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to [email protected]. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
