To continue the earlier discussion about Mechlin and Brussels lace, this
adds on Binche and Val as identifiers.

I think when most lace makers say "Val" they are thinking of the Revival Era
lace which had the so-called "square" ground with relatively dense
clothwork. Here is an example.

http://lynxlace.com/images/lace64b.jpg and
http://lynxlace.com/images/lace584c.jpg 

A modern sample which makes the structure clearer.
http://lynxlace.com/images/lace128atxt.JPG 

 

Also I think that most lace makers think of modern Binche with snowflake
ground, and other ground and fillings. Or perhaps they include the amorphous
gimpless laces of the Revival Era. Michael Giusiana has a lace of this type
in his first Binche book, BINCHE publ 1989 pages 78-79. In the Revival Era
these two types - Binche and Val - are quite distinct. But historically, in
the 18th century the distinction was not that great in overall appearance,
style, or where they were made.

 

This map shows Binche bottom center. Valenciennes is at the same latitude,
about 20-30 miles directly west. In the center outlined in red is the town
of Mechlin/Malines/Mechelen.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mechelen,+Belgium/@50.8853106,4.3808266,9z
/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c3e59450852049:0x40099ab2f4d5800!8m2!3d51.0258761!4d4.4
775362 

 

All of these laces are from a small region. I have heard that other
historians regard them all as very much the same. It certainly is possible
that information, styles, designs could have been passed back and forth.
Most working people would not have traveled far from their birthplace at
that time, but the distances are so close that merchants could easily have
done so.

 

So, in terms of names, I have been using the name Binche/Val for the 18th
century  gimpless lace with a lace pair, and Flanders/Mechlin for the 18th c
lace with gimp.

 

Binche/Val and Flanders/Mechlin all have in common that 2 pairs enter the
clothwork at each pin.  This produces some very complex thread paths in the
clothwork. This distinguishes them from the Point Ground laces, which have
only 1 pair entering (usually).

 

Binche/Val has many similarities with Flanders, structurally, but there are
also differences. Val and Binche do not have gimp, so the problem arises of
how to give a cloth motif and curved rounded smooth boundary. The solution
is to add a "lace pair".  Flanders uses the gimp to serve this purpose. Here
are diagrams showing the 2 side by side.

http://lynxlace.com/images-h-det-diag/valenciennesgnd.JPG   

http://lynxlace.com/images-h-det-diag/flandersgnd.JPG 

Binche/Val from the 18th c.  http://lynxlace.com/images/lace2au.JPG 

 

As with other laces the progression through the 1700s was that laces started
out, early in the time period, to have large motifs with only very small
spaces between. There was virtually no ground at all. But as the century
progressed the ground gradually occupied more and more of the space, until
at about 1800 the ground occupied 90% of the surface.

 

I personally find laces from the 1600s very difficult to deal with. There
are certain ones that I just don't know what to do with. This includes part
laces, as well as the straight/continuous laces.  When I talk about laces
from c 1650-1700 I call them Early Flemish/Brussels (for the part laces),
and Early Binche/Val for the Straight/continuous laces. I am not sure
whether any laces that early had gimp. I am not sure when gimp first
appeared.  Antwerp dominated during that time period, but Antwerp is just
the norther edge of the region on the map. The Antwerp laces also used a
variety of grounds. Paris ground was only one of them.

 

So, for photos - 

https://www.pinterest.com/lynxlacelady/early-straight-laces/  This includes
some LePompe type laces, look near the end.

https://www.pinterest.com/lynxlacelady/binche-%2Bvalenciennes-early/ 

https://www.pinterest.com/lynxlacelady/binche-revival-eramodern/ 

https://www.pinterest.com/lynxlacelady/valenciennes/ 

 

So, for what it is worth ... this is how I use the terms when talking to
myself.

Flemish or early Flemish/early Brussels - part laces 1650-1700

Brussels - part laces 1700 to early 1800s. Levey uses the term Brabant for
the loosely woven, less taught designs, which she attributes to country
regions not close to the city.

Duchesse - part laces from that region, last half 19th c into the 20th c.

 

Binche/Val -  straight laces from the 18th century, without gimp.

Binche - straight laces Revival Era (late 19th into early 20th c) and
modern, using a variety of grounds.

Val - straight laces with square Val ground Revival Era and modern

 

Mechlin/Flanders - straight laces with gimp from the 1700s using a variety
of grounds

Mechlin - revival era and modern  lace using Mechlin ground

Flanders - revival era and modern straight lace using 5 hole ground

 

I can't imagine who is actually going to read this whole post. But there it
is.

Lorelei Halley

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to