Well, what is the definition of 'commercial' use here? AGPL doesn't prevent
someone from selling the software for money but I think if the intention is
to take laconi.ca code, make your modifications and then make it
closed-source("without mentioning base framework"), then I think Evan and
most of the laconi.ca community members would be dead-against such
licensing.tabrez On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Steve Ivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Praveen, > > While I appreciate the sometime usefulness of multi-licensing, knowing > Evan just a little (and his dedication to Free and Open software and > services) I think I can say that the likelyhood of there being a > commercial version of laconica is pretty slim. But Evan would have to > answer that question definitively. > > --Steve > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Praveen Gunasekara > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Well what if someone want to use laconica in a commercial project > > without mentioning about the base framework they use... > > > > have you guys had a thought before about releasing laconica under a > > commercial license ? > > > > if not isn't it the best time to decide the pricing strategy for such > now... :) > > > > waiting for everyone's comments... > > > > Regards, > > > > Praveen Gunasekara > > -- > Steve Ivy > http://redmonk.net // http://diso-project.org > This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > >
_______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
