Also, there's the idea that an instance of laconica can be a group, conceptually. I'm thinking of sportstwit as an example.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Robin Millette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:17:32 -0400, > Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > >> I have another use case, which is for personal groups, which I'd >> implement with tags. For example, I would label @stav and @majnoona and >> @amitajune as "#family", and then I could make notices to the attention >> of my family using @#family and private notices by "d #family". > > +1 > > I was thinking the same thing, able to tag personally users. > >> This is different from Garrett's idea, and has a different purpose. It's >> just to help me manage my own subscriber groups. > > I like Garrett's idea too though. > > -- > Robin > http://rym.waglo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Laconica-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev > -- Steve Ivy http://redmonk.net // http://diso-project.org This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
