Olá Evan e a todos. On Sunday 19 July 2009 19:21:16 Evan Prodromou wrote: > I think this would handle the two false-positives mentioned above. The > only way I can of that it would give false negatives is for clients that > don't set in_reply_to. Which they really should.
+1 > We may want to fine-tune this further in the future by putting a time > limit or inbox limit on those other input channels. It's very unlikely > that someone is replying by XMPP or SMS to a notice that was posted 8 > months ago, or to a notice that they didn't receive via XMPP or SMS. -1 > Comments? Option to echo on XMPP the dent or context id, so one can reply to it, instead of user! -- Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com) (``-_-´´) http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net Linux user #443786 GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB http://BUGabundo.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
