A Dijous 10 Gener 2013, Philip Colmer va escriure: > Thanks for the input, Mourik. > > The reason why I picked groupOfUniqueNames rather than groupOfNames was > because that is the preferred objectClass for Atlassian Crowd, which we are > intending to use for SSO, sitting on top of the LDAP store. I don't think > it makes a big difference as I ultimately seem to have other problems that, > at the moment, seem insurmountable. > > It really doesn't seem to be possible in LDAP to have a group that serves > dual purposes - security and email. posixGroups, which can be used for > security, store members in a way that applications looking at LDAP for mail > groups can't understand. Flip that on its head and it means that > groupof(Unique)Names, which store members differently, cannot be used for > security purposes either.
[...] Hi, I don't know if could helps but we have a similar problem. We needed to add a mail address to a Posix group to use it with sogo. This was because if you make and appointment for all the group, sogo send a mail to the address assigned to the group. It doesn't expand the email of the members of the group: just send an email to the address that you have in that field. To do it in LAM, just open the tree view editor and select the group. In the objectClass part, add value and select extensibleObject. After that, add a new attribute and then select mail. Hope this helps. Leo > -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ Lam-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
