Can't it use something like the one currently used by Serbocroatian wikipedia? 2015年7月31日 下午7:20於 "Amir E. Aharoni" <[email protected]>寫道：
> I'm in favor, in principle, just like for any other language that is > otherwise valid according to the usual policy. > > Political challenges must not get in the way. > > There are practical challenges, such as the yet-unresolved question of the > Tunisian orthography - Latin or Arabic. There will probably be questions of > this kind again, which will be hard for us to resolve, but that's a > different issue. > > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > > 2015-07-31 14:14 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > >> Hoi, >> At the time we accepted Egyptian, there was quite some ruckus because it >> was considered politically incorrect to accept this. >> >> Now that we have a request for "Algerian Arabic", it is prudent to ask >> what our position is. I am all in favour by the way.. >> Thanks, >> Gerard >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
