Keegan, Amir, thank you for clarifying this! And it's good to hear that it moved!
BTW, Allemanish community agreed with the code change? On Oct 28, 2015 08:40, "Amir E. Aharoni" <[email protected]> wrote: > To add to Keegan's reply: be-tarask is already renamed, which sets a good > and long-awaited precedent. > > It is not entirely complete, though, as there is at least one technical > issue remaining: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112426 . AFAIU, it is > supposed to be resolved by Wikidata developers. It's rather important and I > prefer not to rename any further wikis until there's a known way to resolve > it. > > But once that is done, yes, absolutely, let's rename them all. > > As https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T21986 indicates, there are a few > more that shouldn't be controversial: > bh -> bho > eml -> egl > als -> gsw > nrm -> nrf > > And also a few others, though they will require consensus building: > simple -> (not sure what; see another thread) > no -> nb > ku -> kmr > > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > > 2015-10-27 17:06 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>: > >> A couple of months ago I was asked to push code change for Samogotian. >> (At the time I hadn't have regulated my membership on this mailing list, >> then I forgot it.) >> >> But Samogotian is not the only code to be fixed. Basically, we should >> make the decision and suggest to the Board/staff/Phabricator to proceed >> with that. I see that None of the cases I am suggesting is in any way >> problematic, as well as those names are already implemented into the >> interwiki codes. >> >> bat-smg => sgs >> be-x-old => be-tarask >> fiu-vro => vro >> roa-rup => rup >> zh-classical => lzh >> zh-min-nan => nan >> zh-yue => yue >> >> I don't know if you already did or not this, but I think it's time to >> push it. >> >> In relation to the old codes, I think they should stay as "permanent >> redirects" as long as there is a traffic to them. They won't be used in any >> other case, so we don't need to hurry in relation to their removal. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
