On 28.10.2015 08:45, Milos Rancic wrote:
Keegan, Amir, thank you for clarifying this! And its good to hear
that
it moved!
BTW, Allemanish community agreed with the code change?
My last information that there are grievances in part of the
Wikedia community. Some are fatalistic about the change, saying:
"Let us keep als as long as we can."
Purodha
On Oct 28, 2015 08:40, "Amir E. Aharoni" wrote:
To add to Keegans reply: be-tarask is already renamed, which sets a
good and long-awaited precedent.
It is not entirely complete, though, as there is at least one
technical issue remaining: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112426
[3] . AFAIU, it is supposed to be resolved by Wikidata developers.
Its rather important and I prefer not to rename any further wikis
until theres a known way to resolve it.
But once that is done, yes, absolutely, lets rename them all.
As https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T21986 [4] indicates, there are
a few more that shouldnt be controversial:
bh -> bho
eml -> egl
als -> gsw
nrm -> nrf
And also a few others, though they will require consensus building:
simple -> (not sure what; see another thread)
no -> nb
ku -> kmr
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע
אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com [5]
“Were living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-10-27 17:06 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic :
A couple of months ago I was asked to push code change for
Samogotian. (At the time I hadnt have regulated my membership on
this mailing list, then I forgot it.)
But Samogotian is not the only code to be fixed. Basically, we
should make the decision and suggest to the
Board/staff/Phabricator to proceed with that. I see that None of
the cases I am suggesting is in any way problematic, as well as
those names are already implemented into the interwiki codes.
bat-smg => sgs
be-x-old => be-tarask
fiu-vro => vro
roa-rup => rup
zh-classical => lzh
zh-min-nan => nan
zh-yue => yue
I dont know if you already did or not this, but I think its time
to push it.
In relation to the old codes, I think they should stay as
"permanent redirects" as long as there is a traffic to them. They
wont be used in any other case, so we dont need to hurry in
relation to their removal.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] [1]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom [2]
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] [7]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom [8]
Links:
------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
[2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
[3] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112426
[4] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T21986
[5] http://aharoni.wordpress.com
[6] mailto:[email protected]
[7] mailto:[email protected]
[8] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
[9] mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
