I see no opposition by the native speakers neither here [1] or here [2]. Actually, one admin of mo.wp strongly supported it [1][3].
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Mongolian_%28Traditional_Mongolian_Script%29 [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Mongolian_written_in_Mongolian_script [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:MongolWiki On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > mo is a catch all and includes all the ISO-639-3 codes. Our policy has been > that the community may decide on this. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 16 January 2016 at 18:36, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Gerard Meijssen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Why have a Wikipedia where the only difference is a different script? So >> > far >> > we did not accept that. >> >> If you want a formal requirement, present Mongolian Wikipedia is using >> "mo" as ISO 639-1 substitute for "khk", while they are asking for >> "mvf". >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
