On 17 Jan 2016, at 07:35, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > > So far we have proven bad at changing our rules.
As far as I know you’re the only one who really wants to keep this particular rule. If Automatic transliteration is impossible, don’t force it on anyone. > There are several projects waiting for "the nod" and, it is not happening. Which are these? > We could change our ways by allowing for good arguments, persuasive > arguments. I would be swayed when other arguments get considerations. Persuasive arguments include accuracy. It’s an encyclopaedia. Serbian can be converted flawlessly. Caseless/Casing scripts cannot. Ever. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
