On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, there is some effort to revitalise this language. The ethnologue.com > numbers may be outdated as there is even a magazine published four times a > year : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ainu_Times > Still "on hold" is probably (and sadly) the way to go.
The status "on hold" is designed exactly for such examples: A valid living language system which presently doesn't fulfill the minimums for having a useful and living project (or it doesn't have bureaucratic requirements, like ISO 639-3 code is). _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
