Michael's comments to the request
<http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/cr_files/PastComments/CR_Comments_2015-046.pdf>
summarize the issues with the previous language code much better than I
can, you should give it a read if interested.

2017-01-29 13:51 GMT+01:00 Jon Harald Søby <[email protected]>:

> It seems they have completely switched to the Latin alphabet now (the
> language is being actively standardised) so I don't think using a Runic
> alphabet for the modern version of the language makes sense. For an
> eventual Wikisource, though, the Runic alphabet has valid use.
>
> The code issue here is an interesting one. In the first request, 10 years
> ago, they used the code "dlc", which was included in the draft of ISO
> 639-3, but not in the final version. I don't have any sources for this
> (it's a long time ago), but what I heard then was that Elfdalian and
> Scanian (skånska, code scy) were supposed to be in ISO 639-3, but were not
> included because the Swedish authorities would refuse to ratify (/accept?)
> ISO 639-3, ostensibly for political reasons. Now that it has a code,
> however, I'm more than happy to give this eligible status. The fact that it
> doesn't (yet) have an Ethnologue page doesn't matter at all.
>
> I'll contact WMSE to see if they would be interested in supporting this
> language edition. As far as I can tell, there are still no native speakers
> who have signed up for the proposal.
>
> 2017-01-29 9:27 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Mmm... no _Ethnologue_ entry, but ovd is the code, isn't it?
>> >
>> > There's another curiosity here, however: The request page suggests an
>> > autonym in runes, and the Wikipedia page about the language indeed says
>> that
>> > runes were used for writing this language until very late, but nowadays
>> the
>> > Latin alphabet is used.
>>
>> We should see what's the most realistic writing system to them. It's
>> possible that runic script is indeed quite fine; or they could have a
>> transliteration engine.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>
>
>
> --
> mvh
> Jon Harald Søby
>



-- 
mvh
Jon Harald Søby
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to