I see now: Sorry, I assumed I sent the link to the Ethnologue page inside of the first email.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > You have it inside of the first email: https://www.ethnologue.com/language/aii > > Gerard, this shouldn't have been an issue. It was an issue just > because there is a Syriac Wikipedia, and "Syriac" is today a group of > languages. > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Gerard Meijssen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hoi, >> I fail to see the link with that language code that is being suggested. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> On 6 February 2017 at 12:54, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> 11 days ago said: >>> >>> "Oliver, thank you for the effort and thank to prof. Bennett for the >>> detailed analysis! >>> >>> I think we should mark this proposal as eligible. As Oliver sent this >>> clarification today, I am resetting the starting time to today + 7 >>> days for eligibility decision." >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Gerard Meijssen >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hoi, >>> > Based on what? >>> > Thanks, >>> > GerardM >>> > >>> > On 6 February 2017 at 12:11, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I've marked the request for [Wikipedia in] Neo-Aramaic eligible. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > You're welcome. >>> >> > >>> >> > Btw, I just noticed that Mlahsö is also extinct. And Hértevin, >>> >> > Bohtan, >>> >> > Senaya and Koy Sanjaq Surat are also spoken within Christian >>> >> > communities >>> >> > but >>> >> > with very small and dwindling numbers of speakers. Sorry for missing >>> >> > to >>> >> > mark >>> >> > these with + and * respectively. >>> >> > >>> >> > On 30-Jan-17 11:10, MF-Warburg wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks for this explanation! >>> >> > >>> >> > 2017-01-27 8:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver Stegen <[email protected]>: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Here are the ISO codes for Aramaic languages (according to >>> >> >> https://www.ethnologue.com/subgroups/aramaic-1). I've marked the >>> >> >> four >>> >> >> Christian variants with *, Jewish variants with @, and variants >>> >> >> without >>> >> >> L1 >>> >> >> speakers with + (NB: some Jewish variants fall into that category, >>> >> >> i.e. >>> >> >> are >>> >> >> marked @+). >>> >> >> >>> >> >> *Assyrian Neo-Aramaic [aii] (A language of Iraq) >>> >> >> *Chaldean Neo-Aramaic [cld] (A language of Iraq >>> >> >> *Turoyo [tru] (A language of Turkey) >>> >> >> *Western Neo-Aramaic [amw] (A language of Syria) = Maaluli >>> >> >> @+Barzani Jewish Neo-Aramaic [bjf] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @Hulaulá [huy] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @+Jewish Babylonian Aramaic [tmr] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @Lishán Didán [trg] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @Lishana Deni [lsd] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @Lishanid Noshan [aij] (A language of Israel) >>> >> >> @+Samaritan Aramaic [sam] (A language of Palestinian Territory) >>> >> >> Koy Sanjaq Surat [kqd] (A language of Iraq) >>> >> >> Senaya [syn] (A language of Iran) >>> >> >> +Syriac [syc] (A language of Turkey) >>> >> >> Bohtan Neo-Aramaic [bhn] (A language of Georgia) >>> >> >> Hértevin [hrt] (A language of Turkey) >>> >> >> Mlahsö [lhs] (A language of Syria) >>> >> >> Mandaic [mid] (A language of Iraq) >>> >> >> +Mandaic, Classical [myz] (A language of Iran) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On 26-Jan-17 23:47, MF-Warburg wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2017-01-26 10:32 GMT+01:00 Oliver Stegen <[email protected]>: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> He starts with a disclaimer: "I will talk here only about the >>> >> >>> Christian >>> >> >>> Modern Aramaic – the Jewish Modern Aramaic is another thing >>> >> >>> altogether, and >>> >> >>> I am not at all sure of the present status of Modern Mandaic." >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Could you explain this? Are there different Christian and Jewish >>> >> >> languages/dialects (each with ISO codes etc)? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> Langcom mailing list >>> >> >> [email protected] >>> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list >>> >> >> [email protected] >>> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Langcom mailing list >>> >> > [email protected] >>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Langcom mailing list >>> >> > [email protected] >>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Langcom mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Langcom mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
