Yeah and how do we know that is true? I think there's no need to rush now, the project is already active for a long time now and will stay so if it takes some days more. It's not that I don't believe Rachitrali would be a suitable expert himself, but when there's one expert, another one will be somewhere who can at least confirm him, right? And I see Satdeep notes he already contacted one.
Am 12.02.2017 9:54 vorm. schrieb "Milos Rancic" <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:52 AM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ehm no, why should there not be? > > The project creator is one of the most important cultural figures of > that language. It seems to me redundant to check if the language is > legitimate in such circumstances. > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
