OK. Agreed. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:01 AM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah and how do we know that is true? I think there's no need to rush now, > the project is already active for a long time now and will stay so if it > takes some days more. > It's not that I don't believe Rachitrali would be a suitable expert himself, > but when there's one expert, another one will be somewhere who can at least > confirm him, right? And I see Satdeep notes he already contacted one. > > Am 12.02.2017 9:54 vorm. schrieb "Milos Rancic" <[email protected]>: >> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:52 AM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Ehm no, why should there not be? >> >> The project creator is one of the most important cultural figures of >> that language. It seems to me redundant to check if the language is >> legitimate in such circumstances. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
