I agree with Antony. Let's make it a regular procedure. Regards Satdeep Gill
Strategy Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation Co-founder, Punjabi Wikimedians Treasurer, Affiliations Committee Member, Language Committee > On 03-Apr-2017, at 8:25 PM, Antony Green <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it *is* disappointing. I wonder if we should make a checkuser part of > our regular approval procedure to make sure it doesn't happen again, just > like having the authenticity of the language verified is part of our > procedure after someone tried to fool us in the past. > > Antony > >> Am 2017-04-03 um 17:21 schrieb Oliver Stegen: >> Thanks for doing that - even though it's rather disappointing :( >> >>> On 03-Apr-17 13:06, MF-Warburg wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> Yesterday Michael, Amir, and I were looking at the list of contributors to >>> the Khowar test-Wikipedia on Incubator, which was recently approved. >>> Two of the three most active editors are blocked on enwiki as sockpuppets >>> of the same person. Therefore I made a checkuser request and the result >>> (given by steward user:Matiia) is that Rachitrali, Zaheeruddin25 and >>> Mirajbi are all the same person. >>> I closed the phabricator request as it means there is only one regular >>> contributor, not three.. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > -- > Dr. Antony Green > Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 > WE 1703 > 10369 Berlin, Germany > E-Mail: [email protected] > Mobile: +49-176-82295920 > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
