2017-04-04 10:54 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>: > Let's not require CU in such cases. > > As a former CU and steward, I can say that CU actions are used just in the > most extreme situations, when they are really needed, as they by default > violate user's (and lilely users') privacy. > > While it is likely we could enforce this, it would also prolong the > decision in the cases for which CU action will prove to be unnecessary > (99.99% of them). >
I agree with Millosh. It's not allowed to checkuser without any indications of sockpuppetry, so I am not even sure if it would be allowed. Note by the way that I have already previously sometimes requested checks on test-wikis if I had suspicions. There were never "positive" results (i.e. sockpuppetry) on wikis that were close to approval before.
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
