2017-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Danny B. <[email protected]>: > Incubator was actually cranked up slightly before Beta Wikiversity. > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 02:23, 2 June 2006 > https://beta.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 08:59, 15 August 2006 > > Wikisource is 2,5 years older https://wikisource.org/w/index.php?oldid=3 > 00:51, 24 November 2003 > > The more precise answer for having Beta Wikiversity from its supporters > typically is: "Wikiversity is different project than other wikis so it > needs its own site." >
This doesn't sound like a valid reason. If it at least explained WHAT is different, I If there aren't any stronger arguments for keeping the Beta Wikiversity, then it should be moved to the common Incubator. I couldn't find any good arguments against moving to Incubator at the previous discussions: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Move_Beta_Wikiversity_to_Incubator https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Beta_Wikiversity (To alleviate any doubt—I'm only talking about Wikiversity and not Wikisource or any other project.) -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
