Sorry, sent before completing the sentence: This doesn't sound like a valid reason. If it at least explained WHAT is different between Wikiversity and other projects, it would be possible to consider them.
בתאריך 17 באפר׳ 2017 15:02, "Amir E. Aharoni" <[email protected]> כתב: > > 2017-04-17 13:08 GMT+03:00 Danny B. <[email protected]>: > >> Incubator was actually cranked up slightly before Beta Wikiversity. >> >> https://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 02:23, 2 June 2006 >> https://beta.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?oldid=1 08:59, 15 August 2006 >> >> Wikisource is 2,5 years older https://wikisource.org/w/index.php?oldid=3 >> 00:51, 24 November 2003 >> >> The more precise answer for having Beta Wikiversity from its supporters >> typically is: "Wikiversity is different project than other wikis so it >> needs its own site." >> > > This doesn't sound like a valid reason. If it at least explained WHAT is > different, I > > If there aren't any stronger arguments for keeping the Beta Wikiversity, > then it should be moved to the common Incubator. I couldn't find any good > arguments against moving to Incubator at the previous discussions: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Move_Beta_ > Wikiversity_to_Incubator > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_ > projects/Closure_of_Beta_Wikiversity > > (To alleviate any doubt—I'm only talking about Wikiversity and not > Wikisource or any other project.) > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
