Since there were no further comments, I have marked the voting policy as an
adopted policy now. Let's vote away!

2017-07-06 17:28 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <[email protected]>:

> Changed the draft wrt macro languages and BCP:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=16968705&oldid=16781951
>
> 2017-07-04 20:27 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hoi,
>> yes and we reached consensus about the ones we use. There is a concern
>> and having a two third majority should be no problem. We do have ISO 639-3
>> macro languages, they should be avoided.
>> Thanks,
>>      GerardM
>>
>> On 4 July 2017 at 20:19, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Gerard,
>>>
>>> We do not have any top-level BCP 47 tags.
>>>
>>> Wikimedia is already using BCP 47 subtags without any trouble.
>>>
>>> > On 4 Jul 2017, at 15:16, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hoi,
>>> > In the case of macro languages and BCP 47 codes there is a need for a
>>> two third majority. The first is something that should be prevented as much
>>> as possible because it prevents projects that are part of the macro
>>> language. For the BCP 47 there should be a real linguistic point in having
>>> them and we should try to prevent them as they are often more of a
>>> political than linguistic reality.
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >       GerardM
>>> >
>>> > On 9 February 2017 at 17:00, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > One issue: voting.
>>> >
>>> > == Voting ==
>>> >
>>> > This is also proposal, so read it and comment if you don't agree or
>>> > you want any addition.
>>> >
>>> > 1) No voting
>>> >
>>> > 1.1) According to the Closing projects policy [1], particular member
>>> > of the committee analyzes discussion and, if decides that the project
>>> > should be closed, sends the request to WMF Board.
>>> >
>>> > 1.2) Clear-cut situations for making a language eligible for Wikimedia
>>> > projects: the language has a valid ISO 639-3 code, there are no
>>> > significant issues in relation to the language itself, the population
>>> > of speakers is significant, request made by a native speaker. In this
>>> > case, any committee member can mark language / project eligible.
>>> >
>>> > 1.3) Approval without obvious formal requirements. No project will be
>>> > approved without them.
>>> >
>>> > 2) Simple majority (of those who expressed opinion)
>>> >
>>> > 2.1) Eligibility of a language with a valid ISO 639-3 code, but
>>> > without significant population of native speakers. (Note: this covers
>>> > ancient, constructed, reviving and languages with small number of
>>> > speakers.)
>>> >
>>> > 2.2) Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but
>>> > valid BCP 47 code. (Note: this covers Ecuadorian Quechua.)
>>> >
>>> > 2.3) Eligibility of a language with significant collision between
>>> > prescriptive and descriptive information. (Note: this covers
>>> > "macrolangauges".)
>>> >
>>> > 2.4) Project approval if not 1.3.
>>> >
>>> > 3) 2/3 majority (of those who expressed opinion)
>>> >
>>> > 3.1) Any change of the rules, including the committee's role in
>>> > possible changes of the Language proposal policy [2] and Closing
>>> > projects policy [1].
>>> >
>>> > 4) Consensus (of those who expressed opinion)
>>> >
>>> > 4.1) A new member of the Language committee should not be opposed by
>>> > any of the current committee member.
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Closing_projects_policy
>>> > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Language_proposal_policy
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Langcom mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Langcom mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to