Michael, I am sure IETF would find a subtag for Klingon with the extended vocabulary. Or it would require another ISO 639-3 code? I mean, if it's not possible to treat them as so close varieties, so it's not necessary to do any additional standardization.
And how should we treat such hypothetical situatuion? Like American and British English, like Serbian and Croatian or like something else? On Dec 9, 2017 23:44, "Michael Everson" <[email protected]> wrote: Miloš. Klingon vocabulary is created by ONE PERSON and ONE PERSON ONLY, and unless he makes a word for “table”. there isn’t one. > On 9 Dec 2017, at 21:59, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Gerard Meijssen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or tafel or tisch or tryezë or ميز and that is exactly why all these words >> are not to be used in Klingon. The same is true for table actually. > > Your incompetence is astonishing! Please, tell that to the speakers > of, for example, Irish or Welsh. > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
