Hoi,
I expect an apology.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 9 December 2017 at 17:46, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> This [1] sounds like pretty valid and "maybe few" is infinitely larger
> number than 0. Besides the fact that you told me the same information
> ~5 years ago.
>
> The insult was intentional.
>
> [1] http://blog.longnow.org/02009/06/01/klingon-elvish-and-
> esperanto-linguist-takes-a-serious-look-at-invented-languages/
>
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hoi,'
> > and you have it on good authority that there are native speakers of
> Klingon?
> > Who are you fooling. At that, you are insulting.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > On 9 December 2017 at 17:10, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I suppose you have strong evidence that LFN has more native speakers
> >> than Klingon or you are just an ordinary liar?
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hoi,
> >> > In an alternate universe maybe.
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > GerardM
> >> >
> >> > Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >> >> I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually
> >> >> has
> >> >> native speakers.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hoi,
> >> >>> We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that
> ?
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> GerardM
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg
> >> >>>> <[email protected]>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which
> >> >>>> > artificial
> >> >>>> > languages should be eligible?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
> >> >>>> after Esperanto.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> Langcom mailing list
> >> >>>> [email protected]
> >> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Langcom mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >> >>>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Langcom mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Langcom mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Langcom mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Langcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
