Hoi,
What is different why this should be deemoed eligible? Activity is not an
argument.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op ma 2 apr. 2018 om 17:54 schreef Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com>
> I saw no objections (or any other types of comments) to the idea of
> rejecting Wikipedia Northwest African Arabic
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Northwest_African_Arabic>
> and Wikipedia Colloquial Cantonese
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Colloquial_Cantonese>,
> so I am going forward with those.
>
>
> I would still like some thoughts on the subject of Wikipedia Marwari
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Marwari>.
> It's a macrolanguage, but on the other hand as far as I can tell this is a
> decently active test project—and none of its consituent languages has a
> test project. So I'm inclined to mark this eligible.
>
>
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
