Hoi, You have not explained who this project is targetting. When the editors are the audience it fails on principles. I disagree that this is an eligible project. Thanks, GerardM
On 12 June 2018 at 17:21, Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I think the difference between this case and the "Romanized Persian" > situation is that in the "Romanized Persian" case, there is already an > active, solid project in Persian. Thus, anyone wanting to create this > project has to work through the Persian Wikipedia community to make this > happen. In the case of Khorasani Turkic, there is nothing else created in > this language. And the language is inherently eligible. So I think by > policy I need to mark it eligible. By the time it comes to approve the > project, if ever, one of the following will have happened: > > > - Because the general script of the language is Perso-Arabic, people > will have come along and changed the content to that script. > - That doesn't happen, but there is evidence of a community that will > make use of the project in Latin script. > - Some combination of the above, where they will have worked out a * > modus vivendi* between the two while the test is still in Incubator. > > For that reason, I'm not too worried about marking it "eligible". > > Steven > > > Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > > > ------------------------------ > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 20:29:52 +0200 > From: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee > <langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia requests from the second half of 2017 > (first group) > Message-ID: > <CAO53wxWRPL4TC8UpO3e1tFUe-bX0arSQEPRiU_MDw5B27RqZKg@ > mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hoi, > It only makes sense to do so when there is a public. It is not a hobby. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 6 June 2018 at 19:37, Michael Everson <sior...@evertype.com> wrote: > > > I have no objection to a Roman alphabet version of editors wish to create > > one. > > > > > On 6 Jun 2018, at 16:17, Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Khorasani Turkic (kmz): In theory, the language ought to be eligible. > > But the test is written in a Romanized form, which neither Ethnologue nor > > the enwiki article shows as an ordinary variant. Thoughts? > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom