My irritation continues in this thread.
In the discussion on the private list, I have made several remarks about
the proposed changes. I never received an answer to them and now on the
Meta page I see that *none *of them have been reflected in the draft. Yes,
sometimes Langcom discussions attract a low level of participation, but
then you have to at least work with what you get and not ignore it.
What is happening?

Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019 um 21:30 Uhr schrieb Steven White <
[email protected]>:

> The changes I proposed to LPP, which I first shared with the rest of the
> Committee on the private email list on 3 December 2018, will be posted on
> Meta for discussion a little later today (my time). The page containing the
> (proposed) revised policy is here
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy/2-2019_proposed_revision>;
> discussion will be on that page's talk page.  I intend to leave the
> discussion up until the end of February, unless discussion really fades out
> before then.
>
> Steven
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to