Well, suppose that fr.ws hosted Latin texts. It would make no sense to deny
a Latin Wikisource or Latin texts on Multilingual WS because of that.

Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 20:13 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen <
[email protected]>:

> Hoi,
> Reality check. The Chinese community does not want it.. There is one
> person who does and we are to support it? Really?
> Thanks,
>       GerardM
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 18:02, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello and apologies that I only answer on the 7th day, but this is a
>> really complex matter.
>>
>> I have come to a different conclusion and think that the request should
>> not be rejected, but rather made eligible under the current rules.
>> Saying that this content must go to zh.ws is rather similar to saying
>> "Latin content should be on es.ws, as that is the daughter with the most
>> speakers".
>>
>> [We see again here the problem with having Wikisource subdomains, which
>> also leads to funny situations where half a book is on one wiki, and the
>> other half on the other, as in <
>> https://la.wikisource.org/wiki/Pagina:Virgile_-_G%C3%A9orgiques,_traduction_Desportes,_1846,_2.djvu/40
>> >.]
>>
>> Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb Steven White <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>>> MF-Warburg reversed what he felt was a premature and unilateral decision
>>> on my part to reject this request, and rightly so. (This is not least
>>> because I *just* promised to continue to post non-routine closings
>>> here.) My apologies to the Committee. Nevertheless, I am proposing to
>>> reject this request, which has been actively running for about three months.
>>>
>>> In certain respects, Literary Chinese has parallels to Latin, in that it
>>> was the literary *lingua franca* in much of East Asia—not just
>>> China—for centuries. On the basis of policy, one could thus justify
>>> allowing this as an independent project (currently in Multilingual
>>> Wikisource). At the same time, it is also a historical version of Chinese,
>>> and on the basis of policy, one could also justify housing this content in
>>> Chinese Wikisource.
>>>
>>> As a practical matter, there is substantial Literary Chinese content in
>>> Chinese Wikisource already, and very little in Multilingual Wikisource.
>>> Except for the person who made the request, everyone else who contributed
>>> to the discussion on Meta feels that Literary Chinese is adequately and
>>> properly curated on Chinese Wikisource.
>>>
>>> Over the course of the discussion, I made one request of the Chinese
>>> Wikisource community, and that was to make it possible for non-Mandarin
>>> speakers having an interest in this content to have a way to communicate
>>> other than in Mandarin. They have done so.
>>>
>>> It doesn't really serve the bulk of the Literary Chinese community, nor
>>> WMF in general, to split Literary Chinese out from Chinese Wikisource as an
>>> independent project. The objections of the one user making the request
>>> notwithstanding, Wikisource content in Literary Chinese is better off
>>> staying in Chinese Wikisource.
>>>
>>> The discussion page is here
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Literary_Chinese>.
>>> Thank you in advance for your comments. If there are not objections in
>>> seven days, I will proceed to close.
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to