My bias was toward approach 3. On the whole, I agree with MF-W that at least for the time being I'm OK with having Literary Chinese content in both places. Still, our general practice right now is that even if a project is notionally eligible, we want to make sure that some semblance of a community has gathered and that some content is being created. if that doesn't happen, we close the request as "rejected/stale".
In this case, so far, there is one contributor interested, who has created only a handful of pages. My feeling is that we should put the proposal on hold, pending involvement of more people. If more people become involved, I will mark it eligible. But if no one else comes along, then we will mark it "rejected/stale". Any thoughts? Steven Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
