We are trying to investigate this experimentally, but it’s hard: 
https://www.nsa.gov/research/tnw/tnw211/articles/pdfs/TNW_21-1_2015_Article5.pdf
 
<https://www.nsa.gov/research/tnw/tnw211/articles/pdfs/TNW_21-1_2015_Article5.pdf>
 https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/cset15/cset15-ruef.pdf 
<https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/cset15/cset15-ruef.pdf>

> On Jan 12, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Will Sargent <will.sarg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Which thing?  There’s a big chain in there:
> 
> That they’ve written secure code, 
> that it can be abstracted into general principles, 
> that it can be turned into a reusable framework, 
> that it can be made easier than trying to work around it,
> that programmers will ever use it,
> that programmers will ever write secure code even given a framework…
> 
> Wil.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Kaminsky <d...@doxpara.com> <mailto:d...@doxpara.com>
> Reply: Dan Kaminsky <d...@doxpara.com> <mailto:d...@doxpara.com>
> Date: January 11, 2016 at 10:35:19 PM
> To: Will Sargent <will.sarg...@gmail.com> <mailto:will.sarg...@gmail.com>
> CC: Rik Farrow <r...@rikfarrow.com> <mailto:r...@rikfarrow.com>, langsec 
> <langsec-discuss@mail.langsec.org> <mailto:langsec-discuss@mail.langsec.org>
> Subject:  Re: [langsec-discuss] composability
> 
> > A thing we need to experimentally investigate, which pointedly, we are not.
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Will Sargent 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Rik Farrow wrote:
> > >
> > >> Funny. I had just written a column about why programmers cannot write
> > >> secure code:
> > >>
> > >> https://www.usenix.org/publications/login/dec15/farrow
> > >>
> > >> I used Venema and Bernstein as examples of the rare programmers who have
> > >> written secure code. And they make extensive use of simple modules, each
> > >> running with the minimal amount of privileges needed.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I read the article, but I'm really very happy that there are two
> > > programmers who have written secure code, and they're using the same
> > > general principles. That means the principles can be taught, and you can
> > > make a general framework out of those. Make writing small sandboxed
> > > modules the easiest way to write code, and programmers will write secure
> > > code.
> > >
> > > Will.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > langsec-discuss mailing list
> > > langsec-discuss@mail.langsec.org
> > > https://mail.langsec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/langsec-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> langsec-discuss mailing list
> langsec-discuss@mail.langsec.org
> https://mail.langsec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/langsec-discuss

_______________________________________________
langsec-discuss mailing list
langsec-discuss@mail.langsec.org
https://mail.langsec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/langsec-discuss

Reply via email to