Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 12:01 AM 9/25/2001 +0200, Samuele Pedroni wrote: > > > > The other subtle difference, now that I think about it, is a bug in > > Parrot; I > > > wasn't planning to garbage collect vtables the same way that we GC PMCs. > >The python way is more so, vtables (PyTypeObjects) are PMC (PyObjects). > > > >So types are first-class objects. > > Not at the Parrot level they aren't. They might be faked out to be so at > the Perl/Python/Ruby level, though. What is the downside of having types be first-class objects at the Parrot level? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Fred L. Drake, Jr.
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Hong Zhang
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
