Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot?

[Fred L. Drake, Jr.]

Dan Sugalski writes:
 > Not at the Parrot level they aren't. They might be faked out to be so at 
 > the Perl/Python/Ruby level, though.

  Would it not make more sense for Parrot types to be first-class
objects for the language being implemented?  It seems this would make
things easier both for the upper-level runtimes and for
multiple-language applications.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation