On 30.12.2012, 23:43:19 Dominique Pellé wrote: > There was also the idea of introducing <or>...</or> (a bit similar > to already existing <and>...</and> tags) which in some cases can help > reducing the number of rules, but that would admittedly not reduce by > much.
There's OpenRegex which supports regular expressions on tokens. If we could base our matching process on that we might be able to get an OR operator for free and save a lot of lines of complicated code (switching to OpenRegex itself is not "for free" at all, of course): https://github.com/knowitall/openregex Note that I'm not talking about our rule syntax now, but about the pattern matching logic. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512 _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
