Daniel Naber <[email protected]> wrote:] > On 15.03.2013, 11:16:23 Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > >> why don't we move to github? We're not really using sf.net for anything >> that github does not have. The only thing that would be needed is to >> move the SVN history as well (I'm not sure if it's already included in >> the mirror right now). > > The github mirror is currently not complete, it lacks the website, branches > etc. > > Anyway, I'd like to switch to git (no matter if hosted at github or > elsewhere). But git is a very powerful tool that adds some complexity to > the workflow. What do the other committers think? Do you have experience > with git? Would you like to switch? > > If you wonder why we even consider this, the web is full of "git vs. > subversion" content, here's one example: > http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/why-you-should-switch-from-subversion-to-git > In a nutshell: git is much, much faster than subversion. > > Regards > Daniel
I'd prefer git, but I'm fine with Subversion as well. A distributed version control system should make it easier to get new submitters without wondering whether to grant checkin permission as in Subversion. Githup looks really good. I like being able to comment on diffs, among plenty of other things. Regards Dominique ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
