On 2013-09-25 16:11, Stephan Aßmus wrote: > Why is this mentioned nowhere in the top-level documentation, given > that > support for German seems to be particularily mature? Is it because the > dictionary does not affect binary code because it is not "linked" in > the > classical sense of the GPL?
Exactly. If you want to read more, this has also been discussed here: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=65039 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117 All other licenses - that are actually linked and need to be compatible - are documented here: https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool/tree/master/languagetool-standalone/src/main/resources/third-party-licenses Of course you can also use "mvn dependency:tree" to see what gets actually pulled in. Can you tell which product it is that you integrated LT in? Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
