On 2014-07-27 11:20, Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > I think we should use simpleReplaceRule instead. I think I use it for > contractions already.
The problem with that is that incorrectly used irregular verbs are often already detected by the spelling rule, it's just that its suggestion isn't helpful. If we add another rule we have two matches at the same word and the client won't know which one to use. So I guess the better suggestions either need to be added in the Java code of the rule, or by using replacement pairs? Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
