W dniu 2014-07-27 20:23, Daniel Naber pisze: > On 2014-07-27 11:20, Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > >> I think we should use simpleReplaceRule instead. I think I use it for >> contractions already. > > The problem with that is that incorrectly used irregular verbs are often > already detected by the spelling rule, it's just that its suggestion > isn't helpful. If we add another rule we have two matches at the same > word and the client won't know which one to use. So I guess the better > suggestions either need to be added in the Java code of the rule, or by > using replacement pairs?
For contractions, I simply added them to the list of words ignored by the speller, so that I get no matches for "couldnt" from the spelling rule. Then, the contraction rule matches "couldnt" and offers a proper correction. Replacement pairs can be slower, as they add some overhead for searching suggestions. They are a hacky solution to a simple problem, which we can solve better with a simple replace rule. Regards, Marcin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
