Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@languagetool.org> wrote:
On 2014-09-09 22:38, Dominique Pellé wrote:
>
> > * why does your example give a message in
> > the java rule. Why can't we use <message…></message>
> > instead?
>
> You're right, my example was misleading. <message> can be used.
>
> > * you wrote that args="no:1" refers to the token.
> > What about if we need to use this for one of the
> > <exception>...</exception> inside a token?
>
> We could introduce more attributes like maybe 'regexp_negate'.
>
> > In other words, the rule matches token "(.*)-tu" where
> > the POS of portion in parentheses has to be a verb (V.*).
> > But there is an exception if the POS of partion in parenthesis
> > matches "V.* 2 .*". So that rule would correctly:
>
> Couldn't that also be expressed with "V.* [13] .*"?
No, that would miss at least infinitive verbs "V inf"
(e.g. chanter) participles "V ppa m s" (chanté)
and "V ppr" (chantant).
We could of course come up with a regexp that
matches all the possible verbs POS except those
"V.* 2 .*" to avoid an exception, but:
* that regexp might be rather long as there are
many kinds of POS verbs. Using an exception is
this more natural.
* and more generally speaking, being able to
match POS of portion of token in exception
can be useful in some other cases anyway too.
Regards
Dominique
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel