Hi, I wonder if we could use the switch to Morfologik as an opportunity to rethink our general approach to dictionaries.
Currently we use two dictionaries for all the fully supported languages afaik, and those contribute considerably to the large download size of LanguageTool. Why not use just one dictionary per language and keep all the necessary data in one well organised place? This large word database could contain everything we need: tags and base form for the grammar checking, frequency information for the spelling suggestions, just about everything. Even if we want the dictionary to contain incorrect/outdated spellings for tagging purposes, all we need is a one-bit flag that tells the spell-checking routine if a word is misspelled. Cheers, Jan Am 11.10.2014 12:00, schrieb Daniel Naber: > Hi, > > to provide LT as a 100% pure Java software, I'd like to switch from > Hunspell (native code) to Morfologik (Java-based). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
