Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@languagetool.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> to provide LT as a 100% pure Java software, I'd like to switch from
> Hunspell (native code) to Morfologik (Java-based). For that, I think the
> following languages are easy to switch:
>
>      Asturian
>      Galician
>      Khmer
>      Spanish
>      Tagalog
>      Esperanto
>      Icelandic
>
> Does anybody see a problem with me switching those languages to
> Morfologik? For Esperanto and Icelandic this would also have the benefit
> that they can then offer suggestions for typos.
>
> Does anybody see a problem with that? Other languages (fr, de, sv,
> pt-BR) might not be easy to switch, please see
> https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool/issues/199 for details.

I don't have the time to look at it these days, but I hope to have
the time later.  Anyway, I'm concerned that we're trying to get
rid of Hunspell. I don't think that Morfologik covers all Hunspell
features. Anyway, I'll give Morfologik a try for French and Esperanto
later to see what's missing. Please don't remove Hunspell until it
is sorted out.

Regards
Dominique

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel

Reply via email to