W dniu 2014-12-22 o 11:33, Daniel Naber pisze:
> On 2014-12-20 11:32, Heikki Lehvaslaiho wrote:
>
> Heikki,
>
>> I've set up a gist with 80 English rules that (mostly) expand
>> redundant/wordy rules in LanguageTools 2.7. Testrules script passes
>> these, but it would be good for someone to go though them before
>> inclusion to the main rules file.
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/heikkil/4efc378102037651f755 [1]
>
> thanks for those rules! Style rules can cause false alarms, or the
> messages could be considered to be false alarms, so I'm not sure whether
> we should activate these rules by default. What do others think?

I think these rules are following extreme prescriptivism.

I am strongly against the inclusion of such rules as turned on by 
default, because they raise false alarms for perfect English. My rough 
guide is this: if your rules tell that Jane Austen and Charles Dickens 
are bad writers, then your rules are simply wrong. And Dickens does use 
the words indicated in the rules; see for example 'accompany':

https://books.google.pl/books?id=INkAes9Y5AYC&pg=PA538&lpg=PA538&dq=accompany+%22charles+dickens%22&source=bl&ots=_lFgWHI48o&sig=X1vs7tIDaTPM9WSA7sGsXCPOwRo&hl=pl&sa=X&ei=zg6YVK6RCMWBU-XEgdAF&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=accompany%20%22charles%20dickens%22&f=false

(page 223).

This said, they might be useful for technical writing; in such writing, 
linguistic variation is indeed to be limited. But Mike Unwalla would 
know better.

Best regards,
Marcin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel

Reply via email to